- Profit after tax trippled, driven by net operating income jumping 183% with trading and FX income soaring 564%, net fee & commission income tripling as well
- Total assets grew 54%, gross loans and advances reached ZWG1.86 billion, debt factoring portfolio exploded 880% to ZWG341.5 million now 18.4% of loans
- Non-performing loans collapsed 96% to ZWG11,795 (outstanding quality), capital adequacy ratio eased to 16.4%, liquidity ratio improved to 57%
|
Metric |
H1 FY2026 (Dec 2025) |
H1 FY2025 (Dec 2024) |
|
Net Interest Income |
ZWG 127.7m |
ZWG 86.1m |
|
Trading & FX Income |
ZWG 176.5m |
ZWG 26.6m |
|
Net Fee & Commission Income |
ZWG 176.3m |
ZWG 58.8m |
|
Net Operating Income |
ZWG 436.0m |
ZWG 153.9m |
|
Profit for the Period |
ZWG 99.5m |
ZWG 33.0m |
|
Total Assets |
ZWG 3.80bn |
ZWG 1.67bn |
|
Gross Loans & Advances |
ZWG 1.86bn |
— |
|
Customer Deposits |
ZWG 1.68bn |
— |
|
Trust Funds (Wallet Deposits) |
ZWG 261.5m |
ZWG 403.1m (Jun 25) |
|
Total Borrowings |
ZWG 1.30bn |
ZWG 602.6m (Jun 25) |
|
Capital Adequacy Ratio |
16.4% |
17.6% (Jun 25) |
|
Debt Factoring Portfolio |
ZWG 341.5m |
ZWG 34.9m (Jun 25) |
|
Non-Performing Loans |
ZWG 11,795 |
ZWG 329,037 (Jun 25) |
Harare- InnBucks MicroBank Limited has delivered half-year results for the six months ended 31 December 2025 that, at first reading, appear remarkable.
Profit nearly tripled to ZWG 99.5 million from ZWG 33 million, net operating income surged 183% to ZWG 436 million, and total assets expanded 54% to ZWG 3.80 billion.
A closer read reveals something more nuanced. The engine of the profit surge was trading and foreign exchange income, which exploded 564% to ZWG 176.5 million in a single period. Borrowings nearly doubled. Capital adequacy tightened to just above the regulatory minimum, and nd trust fund wallet deposits, the digital payments product around which InnBucks originally built its identity fell by 35%.
The growth is genuine. Basic earnings per share climbed from 20,358 cents to 61,393 cents, and the absolute scale of revenue expansion reflects a business that has grown its asset base, broadened its client segments, and diversified its income streams.
The primary driver, however, was trading and foreign exchange income. This line , covering cash swap commissions and foreign currency trading , contributed ZWG 176.5 million, up from ZWG 26.6 million a year earlier.
To contextualise that figure, the entire net operating income of the business in the prior period was ZWG 153.9 million. Trading income alone in this period exceeded that entire base. Cash swap commissions accounted for ZWG 75.9 million of the total and foreign currency trading ZWG 110.4 million.
In a country with a 30% parallel market premium on the ZiG, forex trading is exceptionally lucrative , but it is not credit intermediation, and it carries a fundamentally different risk and sustainability profile.
Net fee and commission income also grew powerfully, from ZWG 58.8 million to ZWG 176.3 million. Within this, drawdown fees of ZWG 85.8 million appeared for the first time, likely reflecting the explosion in the debt factoring portfolio and the fee income generated from structured credit products in the business banking segment.
Cash withdrawal fees more than tripled to ZWG 34.5 million, and cash management fees grew from ZWG 7 million to ZWG 27.9 million. This fee income story is more organic and more sustainable than the trading income story , it reflects a business adding customers and processing more transactions.
The most strategically significant development in the results is the explosion in the debt factoring portfolio. At 30 June 2025, the book stood at ZWG 34.9 million. By 31 December 2025, it had grown to ZWG 341.5 million , an increase of approximately 880% in six months.
Debt factoring now represents 18.4% of gross loans and advances, making it the second-largest category after overdraft loans.
Debt factoring , the purchasing of trade receivables at a discount in exchange for immediate liquidity is structurally different from the salary-based consumer lending that has historically been InnBucks' core offering.
It is a business banking product with a different risk profile, and its rapid emergence as a major balance sheet item warrants attention. The business banking segment contributed ZWG 174.6 million in profit for the period against ZWG 29.7 million from retail banking, with segment assets of ZWG 3.2 billion against retail's ZWG 532.7 million.
InnBucks is, in structural terms, becoming as much a business bank as a microfinance and retail payments institution. Whether that transition is being managed at the appropriate pace and with adequate risk frameworks is a question the results raise but do not answer.
InnBucks was built on the InnBucks wallet , a digital payments product that positioned the microbank at the intersection of fintech and formal banking. The trust funds line in the balance sheet tells an uncomfortable story. At 30 June 2025, trust funds stood at ZWG 403.1 million. By 31 December 2025, they had fallen to ZWG 261.5 million , a decline of 35% in six months.
Merchant wallet balances fell from ZWG 267.3 million to ZWG 84.9 million, a 68% decline. Individual wallet balances grew slightly from ZWG 135.8 million to ZWG 176.6 million, but not enough to offset the merchant exodus.
The merchant decline is the more significant movement. It suggests that businesses processing payments through InnBucks are either migrating balances to formal deposit accounts, withdrawing cash more rapidly, or reducing their use of the platform altogether.
The migration hypothesis is supported by 63% growth in formal customer deposits to ZWG 1.68 billion over the same period. But the net trust fund decline cannot be fully explained by intra-platform migration, and a 68% fall in merchant wallets raises a genuine question about the platform's commercial traction with its core segment.
Total borrowings grew from ZWG 602.6 million at 30 June 2025 to ZWG 1.30 billion at 31 December 2025 , an increase of 116% in six months. Short-term borrowings surged from ZWG 225.4 million to ZWG 836.5 million, a 271% increase, and represent the most significant component of that growth.
The consequence is visible in capital adequacy. The total capital adequacy ratio fell from 17.6% to 16.4%, against the RBZ minimum of 15%. The Tier 1 ratio declined from 15.3% to 13.3%. The buffer above the regulatory minimum has narrowed from 2.6 percentage points to 1.4 percentage points in a single period.
A 16.4% CAR remains respectable for a growing microfinance institution, but the direction of travel matters. If asset growth continues at the current pace without a corresponding increase in equity, the capital cushion will thin further.
The liquidity gap analysis also deserves attention. The one-to-three month bucket shows a negative cumulative gap of ZWG 273.3 million, and the six-to-twelve month bucket a further negative gap of ZWG 223.9 million.
The overall liquidity ratio improved from 43% to 57% , comfortably above the regulatory minimum , but the concentration of short-term borrowings in the three-to-twelve month maturity window means InnBucks faces meaningful rollover risk if credit market conditions tighten or offshore lenders grow cautious on Zimbabwe exposure.
Against the complexity elsewhere, asset quality is genuinely outstanding. Non-performing loans collapsed from ZWG 329,037 at 30 June 2025 to ZWG 11,795 at 31 December 2025 , a 96% reduction. The Stage 3 loan balance represents a negligible share of gross loans of ZWG 1.86 billion.
The ECL allowance grew from ZWG 42.4 million to ZWG 50.6 million, but with a gross portfolio that expanded by ZWG 357.8 million in the period, provisioning coverage remains conservative and the net provision charge of ZWG 35.3 million is well-absorbed within the period's profit.
Interest income from business banking customers grew from ZWG 29.3 million to ZWG 75.5 million, and from individual customers from ZWG 88.1 million to ZWG 107 million , both reflecting portfolio growth rather than rate increases, suggesting credit quality in new originations is being maintained.
Therefore, InnBucks MicroBank's results tell the story of a business in rapid and significant transition. The profit growth is real, the asset quality metrics are outstanding, and the fee income expansion reflects genuine customer activity. But the composition of that profit , heavily weighted toward trading and forex income that is inherently episodic and environment-dependent , raises a legitimate question about underlying earnings power in a more normalised exchange rate environment.
The explosion in debt factoring signals a deliberate strategic pivot into business banking that is moving faster than the narrative around it. The wallet deposit decline asks a question about the core fintech identity of the institution that management has not yet publicly answered.
The borrowings surge and tightening capital ratios are not yet concerning in absolute terms, but a business that grows its balance sheet 54% in six months while its capital buffer narrows and short-term borrowings triple will need either equity injection or sustained earnings retention to maintain its growth trajectory without regulatory constraint.
Equity Axis News
