• ZIMRA mandates presumptive tax clearance for vehicle licenses and insurance, with ZINARA as the collection agent, ensuring compliance
• Effective September 2025, revised presumptive tax rates US$50-$100 for kombis, US$35 for taxis, up to US$500 for heavy goods vehicles
• The simplified presumptive tax regime lowers compliance costs, fostering predictability for transport sector investments, but fixed levies may burden low-earning operators

Harare- The Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) has introduced a stringent enforcement mechanism for revised presumptive tax rates targeting the public transport sector, including commuter omnibuses known as kombis, taxi cabs, driving schools, and goods vehicles. Under Section 36(C) of the Taxes Act, the Zimbabwe National Road Administration (ZINARA) serves as the primary collection agent, integrating tax payments seamlessly with vehicle licensing processes.

This policy mandates that no vehicle licenses or insurance policies will be issued without a presumptive tax clearance certificate from the Commissioner General, effectively linking compliance to operational viability.

Payments must be made exclusively in the local ZiG currency at the official exchange rate, regardless of the currency used in business transactions, as a deliberate strategy to bolster the gold-backed national tender and mitigate dollarisation pressures in an economy where the informal sector dominates over 60% of activities.

Presumptive taxation represents a simplified regime designed for small-scale and informal operators who often evade traditional income-based assessments due to limited record-keeping or cash-based operations.

It presumes a fixed taxable income based on objective indicators like vehicle capacity, tonnage, or business type, rather than audited accounts, thereby broadening the fiscal base with minimal administrative burden on taxpayers.

In Zimbabwe's context, this fixed monthly levy approach aims to capture revenue from hard-to-tax segments while promoting compliance through enforcement tied to essential services like licensing.

The newly revised rates, effective from September 2025 under Public Notice No. 51, are scaled progressively to reflect potential revenue generation: kombis face US$50 for 8-14 passengers, US$60 for 15-24, US$80 for 25-36, and US$100 for over 37; taxi cabs pay a flat US$35; driving schools US$50 for Class 4 and US$100 for Classes 1 and 2; while goods vehicles incur US$200 for 10-20 tonnes and up to US$500 for over 20 tonnes or those with trailers.

These rates, denominated in US dollars but payable in ZiG, mark significant reductions from prior levels—for instance, the tax for 18-seater kombis dropped from US$175 to US$60 monthly, mirroring broader relief for micro-entrepreneurs as outlined in the July 2024 Mid-Term Budget Review.

This type of taxation offers notable advantages for investments and economic participation in informal-heavy economies like Zimbabwe's. Primarily, it reduces compliance costs by eliminating the need for detailed bookkeeping, audits, or complex declarations, allowing small operators to allocate resources toward business growth, vehicle maintenance, or fuel amid high operational expenses in a post-pandemic, import-reliant nation.

For investors eyeing the transport sector vital for urban mobility and logistics it fosters predictability with fixed levies, potentially attracting micro-investments in fleet expansion without the dread of arbitrary assessments.

Globally, presumptive systems in countries like India (under Sections 44AD/44ADA) enable small businesses to declare 6-8% of turnover as presumptive profit, slashing administrative hurdles and encouraging formalisation, which indirectly boosts investment by integrating informal players into credit and banking systems.

In Brazil, simplified regimes for micro-enterprises use turnover-based presumptions to lower barriers, promoting entrepreneurship in logistics and transport, though high overall compliance time (over 2,600 hours annually) can deter larger investments.

However, disadvantages loom large: the fixed nature can burden low-earning operators during lean periods, potentially stifling investments if rates exceed actual profits, leading to business closures or evasion.

Unlike progressive income taxes, presumptive levies may unfairly tax inefficient or seasonal ventures more heavily, as noted by the OECD, where presumptions based on averages disadvantage underperformers and could discourage scaling up investments in vehicle upgrades or route expansions.

In the US, while no direct presumptive income tax exists for small businesses, state sales taxes on transport services add variable burdens, but federal incentives like depreciation deductions for investments offer more flexibility than Zimbabwe's rigid model, potentially making US investments in trucking more attractive despite higher overall rates.

Comparatively, Zimbabwe's approach aligns with regional African practices but reveals nuances in fairness and enforcement. In Kenya, presumptive taxes on public transport are levied as advance taxes on turnover for matatus (similar to kombis), often at 1-3% of gross receipts, integrated with county licensing much like ZINARA's role, which has broadened the base but faced criticism for regressivity on low-margin operators.

Uganda enforces a 3% presumptive tax on informal traders and transporters since 2014, with recent 2020 reforms introducing progressive slabs for small firms, emphasising incentives like simplified filing to boost compliance yielding modest revenue gains without the harsh license denial seen in Zimbabwe.

South Africa applies turnover tax (TOT) under its presumptive regime for micro-enterprises, including minibus taxis at rates up to 3% on turnover below ZAR 1 million, but with rebates for essentials like fuel, making it fairer for volatile sectors; studies show it reduces evasion in taxis but highlights equity issues for rural operators, similar to Zimbabwe's urban bias.

Globally, India's system is more investment-friendly with opt-in presumptive rates (8% for non-digital turnover) and no audits for eligible small transporters, contrasting Zimbabwe's mandatory fixed levies that could penalize unprofitable months. Brazil's dual federal-state presumptions for small logistics firms cap rates at 6% but suffer from bureaucratic overload, leading to higher evasion rates than Zimbabwe's enforcement-linked model.

Overall, while Zimbabwe's reductions (e.g., 65% cut for 18-seaters) demonstrate economic realism and fairness relative to pre-2024 hikes preventing closures in a sector employing thousands and supporting GDP through commuting and freight, the absence of income-based thresholds or rebates risks inequity for low-revenue operators, unlike progressive tweaks in Uganda or South Africa.

This makes Zimbabwe's system reasonably fair in a regional context of informal dominance but less adaptive than global peers, potentially hindering long-term investments unless paired with subsidies for fuel or maintenance.

By enforcing presumptive tax as a prerequisite for licenses and insurance, ZIMRA wields a potent deterrent against evasion, transforming it from a dormant tool into a revenue powerhouse, though initial administrative snags may challenge operators. This ties into broader fiscal reforms amid currency woes and deficits, balancing revenue needs with nurturing small businesses that drive employment and GDP.

As formalised in the September 5, 2025 notice, the policy shows adaptive governance, urging prompt registration to avoid disruptions like halted operations, while fostering an inclusive ecosystem that empowers grassroots transport entrepreneurs rather than burdening them.

Equity Axis News