• Government says 291 business-cost measures have now been fully implemented
• Local Government has implemented 62 of 201 measures, leaving 139 outstanding
• The original review targeted completion by first quarter 2026

Harare- Zimbabwe has fully implemented 291 reviewed licences, permits, levies and fees under its cost-of-doing-business programme, according to Cabinet’s latest implementation report, moving a portion of the reform package from policy approval into charges that companies can actually experience. Cabinet’s own breakdown shows a considerably less advanced position in Local Government, where only 62 of 201 approved measures have been implemented, leaving 139 outstanding.

That puts Local Government implementation at 30.8%, with 69.2% of the identified measures still awaiting operationalisation. Cabinet did not disclose the total number of approved reforms across all sectors, meaning the 291 completed measures cannot be converted into an economy-wide implementation percentage from the latest report. The Local Government disclosure is therefore the clearest measurable window into how far policy approval has travelled into actual business costs.

The timeline adds an execution issue. Government began the targeted exercise after President Emmerson Mnangagwa raised concern over high and numerous business charges in January 2025. By November, reforms had been approved in only five of the original 12 priority sectors—livestock, dairy and stockfeed manufacturing, tourism, transport, wholesale and retail, and energy—and Treasury set the first quarter of 2026 as the target for completing reviews in the remaining seven sectors.

That review timetable subsequently extended further. Mining reforms were approved by Cabinet on 5 May 2026, already outside the first-quarter target, and Government continued a mop-up exercise covering residual sectors and sub-sectors through August. The latest Cabinet report describes the comprehensive review and mop-up as running from August 2025 to August 2026, placing the process roughly five months beyond Treasury’s earlier Q1 completion date.

The size of the original regulatory burden explains why implementation speed has commercial consequences. World Bank work mapping agriculture, agro-processing and tourism found some businesses facing up to 28 separate legal and regulatory requirements, involving as many as nine ministries and 12 government touchpoints. For a model small beef farmer, recurring compliance costs reached an estimated 464% of annual revenue; small stockfeed manufacturers faced about 31%, and small boating businesses about 30%.

The first round of reforms therefore carried substantial potential savings. World Bank modelling of changes covering beef, dairy, stockfeed and tourism estimated that eliminating or reducing Agricultural Marketing Authority levies, Environmental Management Agency charges and selected conformity-assessment requirements could cut compliance costs by 19% to 94%, depending on the business and its size.

Cabinet approval alone does not deliver those savings. A ministry can approve removal of a licence or reduction of a fee, yet businesses continue facing the existing legal charge until the relevant Finance Act provision, statutory instrument, by-law or administrative procedure takes effect. Treasury itself acknowledged this sequencing in the 2026 Budget, saying some reforms had been gazetted and others still required statutory instruments and legal changes by line ministries.

Wholesale and retail provides a useful example. Cabinet approved removal of a US$703 local-authority bakery licence, reduction of a Procurement Regulatory Authority of Zimbabwe licence from US$120 to US$20, a 50% cut to a US$661 health-report charge and reduction of a National Social Security Authority elevator-registration fee from US$200 to US$20. Treasury stated that these measures still required refinement and appropriate gazetting.

Some of that legal conversion has since happened. Statutory Instrument 41 of 2026 introduced national model local-authority charges that cap a municipal shop or business licence at US$500, set financial-services registration at US$20 and abolish licences for bakeries and butcheries operating within retail shops, among other changes. The latest Cabinet report nevertheless places Local Government implementation at only 62 of 201 approved measures.

This makes local authorities one of the main transmission points between reform policy and the cost companies actually carry. National Government can set model caps or eliminate an obsolete requirement, then implementation still has to reach councils, licensing offices and the individual administrative processes where firms renew permits and make payments. Until the outstanding 139 Local Government measures are operational, the saving available to firms remains uneven across activities and jurisdictions.

Banking presents a different implementation constraint. Cabinet says reviewed bank charges are being adopted at different levels across individual banks, rather than reporting a uniform completed change. Treasury data show why the adjustment is economically material to lenders: fees and commissions accounted for 45.37% of banking-sector income at June 2025, well above the 31.91% generated from interest on loans, advances and leases.

Reducing bank charges therefore reaches directly into a major banking profit pool. It also connects to Government’s formalisation objective because Treasury has linked high charges to cash remaining outside the banking system. An uneven reduction across institutions leaves businesses receiving different levels of relief from one of the most frequently incurred transaction costs in the formal economy.

The implementation gap reaches beyond regulatory administration. Treasury explicitly included the implementation of ease-of-doing-business reforms among the assumptions supporting its 5% economic growth projection for 2026, expecting lower licences, fees and charges to reduce production costs and improve the competitiveness of domestic products.

The World Bank’s September 2026 Growth and Jobs Report keeps regulatory reform among Zimbabwe’s four major structural priorities. It calls for simpler business permits, lower administrative fees, easier cross-border procedures and a streamlined tax environment to help smaller businesses invest, expand and formalise.

The measurement standard now needs to move beyond the number of reforms Cabinet has approved or fully implemented. A useful implementation dashboard would publish the total approved measures, the number legally gazetted, the number operational at agency level, the outstanding measures by sector, and the annual compliance-cost saving delivered to firms. Without that denominator, 291 provides scale without establishing how much of the programme is complete.

Government has already created a mechanism to reduce the chance of the regulatory burden rebuilding. National Development Strategy 2 requires proposed new or revised licences, levies, permits and fees to undergo a Regulatory Impact Assessment through the National Competitiveness Commission before implementation. That provides a forward test for whether removed costs remain permanently out of the system rather than being replaced through new regulatory charges.

The reform programme has produced genuine fee removals, caps and legal changes. Its economic value is now measurable at the point where businesses pay, renew and seek approval. Local Government’s 30.8% implementation rate, uneven bank-charge adoption and the absence of an economy-wide completion denominator leave execution as the remaining test of a reform programme that has already spent more than a year identifying what should change.

Equity Axis News